MoSCoW Prioritization: The Complete Guide for Product Managers
Learn how to use the MoSCoW method to prioritize product features and requirements effectively. Includes examples, templates, and best practices.

Product Leader Academy
PM Education
What is MoSCoW Prioritization?
MoSCoW is a prioritization framework that helps product teams categorize features and requirements into four distinct groups. The acronym stands for:
- Must Have
- Should Have
- Could Have
- Won't Have (this time)
Originally developed by Dai Clegg at Oracle for use in rapid application development, MoSCoW has become one of the most widely-used prioritization methods in product management and agile development.
The Four MoSCoW Categories
Must Have (Mo)
These are non-negotiable requirements. Without them, the product won't work or won't be legally compliant. They represent the minimum viable product (MVP).
Criteria for Must Have:
- The product is unusable without this feature
- There's no workaround available
- It's required for legal/compliance reasons
- The release would be pointless without it
Example: For an e-commerce app, payment processing is a Must Have.
Should Have (S)
Important features that add significant value but aren't critical for launch. The product can work without them, but they're high priority.
Criteria for Should Have:
- High business value but not critical
- Painful to leave out but possible
- Can be delayed to a later release
- Workarounds exist (even if inconvenient)
Example: Saved payment methods or order history features.
Could Have (Co)
Nice-to-have features that would improve user experience but have minimal impact if omitted. First to be cut when time or budget runs short.
Criteria for Could Have:
- Nice to have but not essential
- Small impact on user satisfaction
- Easy to add later
- Low development priority
Example: Product recommendations or wishlist functionality.
Won't Have (W)
Features explicitly excluded from the current scope. This category is crucial for managing stakeholder expectations and preventing scope creep.
Criteria for Won't Have:
- Out of scope for this release
- May be reconsidered for future releases
- Not aligned with current goals
- Resource constraints make it impossible
Example: Multi-currency support in an initial domestic launch.
How to Implement MoSCoW Prioritization
Step 1: Gather All Requirements
List all features, user stories, or requirements that need prioritization. Include input from stakeholders, customers, and the development team.
Step 2: Define Your Constraints
Understand your limitations:
- Time: Sprint deadline or release date
- Budget: Development resources available
- Team capacity: Skills and bandwidth
Step 3: Categorize Each Item
For each requirement, ask:
- Is the project a failure without this? → Must Have
- Is it painful to exclude but survivable? → Should Have
- Is it nice to have with low impact? → Could Have
- Is it explicitly out of scope? → Won't Have
Step 4: Validate with Stakeholders
Review the categorization with key stakeholders. Ensure alignment on what constitutes "must have" vs "should have."
Step 5: Allocate Resources
A common rule of thumb:
- 60% of effort on Must Haves
- 20% on Should Haves
- 20% on Could Haves
Best Practices
1. Keep Must Haves Minimal
If everything is a Must Have, nothing is. Limit this category to true essentials—aim for no more than 60% of your backlog.
2. Be Explicit About Won't Haves
Document why items are excluded. This prevents repeated discussions and manages expectations.
3. Revisit Regularly
Priorities shift. Review your MoSCoW categorization at the start of each sprint or release cycle.
4. Use Data to Support Decisions
Back up prioritization with:
- User research findings
- Usage analytics
- Customer feedback
- Business metrics
MoSCoW vs Other Frameworks
| Framework | Best For | Key Differentiator |
|---|---|---|
| MoSCoW | Requirements triage | Clear categories, stakeholder-friendly |
| RICE | Scoring backlog items | Quantitative, reach-focused |
| Kano | Customer satisfaction | Emotional impact analysis |
| Value vs Effort | Quick decisions | Simple 2x2 matrix |
When to Use MoSCoW
Ideal scenarios:
- Fixed timeline projects
- MVP definition
- Stakeholder alignment sessions
- Scope negotiation
- Sprint planning
Less ideal for:
- Continuous discovery
- Research prioritization
- Strategic roadmap planning
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Everything is a Must Have - Be ruthless in categorization
- Ignoring Won't Haves - Explicit exclusion prevents scope creep
- Static prioritization - Revisit as conditions change
- Skipping stakeholder alignment - Get buy-in on criteria
Template: MoSCoW Workshop
Run a 90-minute session with your team:
- Setup (10 min): Explain MoSCoW, set context
- Silent brainstorm (15 min): Each person categorizes independently
- Share & discuss (40 min): Review disagreements, find consensus
- Finalize (15 min): Lock in priorities, document rationale
- Next steps (10 min): Assign owners, set review cadence
Conclusion
MoSCoW prioritization is a powerful tool for product managers navigating competing priorities and stakeholder demands. Its simplicity makes it accessible, while its categorical structure forces clear decisions.
The key to success? Discipline in the Must Have category and transparency about Won't Haves. Combined with regular reviews, MoSCoW can transform how your team makes prioritization decisions.
Ready to master prioritization? Join the Product Leader Academy community for frameworks, templates, and peer learning.
Tags
Related Articles
RICE Scoring: The Data-Driven Prioritization Framework
Master the RICE scoring model to prioritize features based on Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort. Complete guide with calculator and examples.
Value vs. Effort Matrix: Quick Prioritization Guide
Learn to use the 2x2 Value vs. Effort matrix for rapid feature prioritization. Identify quick wins and strategic investments.
Weighted Scoring Model: Objective Feature Prioritization
Build a weighted scoring system to objectively evaluate and prioritize product features. Includes templates and real-world examples.